Legislature(2001 - 2002)
2002-02-04 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2002-02-04 House Journal Page 2145 HB 359 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 359 "An Act making a supplemental appropriation for tourism marketing efforts; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page FIN RPT 6DP 1DNP 4NR 2112 LETTER OF INTENT WITH FIN REPORT 2112 Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representatives Lancaster, Murkowski, and Hudson: Page 1, line 4: Delete "6,000,000" Insert "4,700,000" Page 1, lines 7-9, following "Association": Delete all material. Insert "." Page 1, line 4, insert a new section to read: "*Section 1. LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS. The legislature finds that the Tourism Industry is facing an economic challenge due to the recent terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. To mitigate the effects of September 11, the legislature should provide this supplemental appropriation, the amount appropriated in FY02. In the meantime, the legislature shall look for additional funds to help the industry that do not increase the broadening budget gap. Depending on available funding in FY03, this forward funding supplemental may or may not take the place of FY03 Tourism Marketing appropriations. Renumber the following sections accordingly. 2002-02-04 House Journal Page 2146 Representative Lancaster moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 359 Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 28 EXCUSED: 5 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Dyson, Hudson, Kookesh, Lancaster, Moses, Murkowski, Wilson Nays: Berkowitz, Bunde, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Davies, Fate, Foster, Guess, Harris, Hayes, James, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kohring, Kott, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Mulder, Ogan, Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Chenault, Cissna, Green, Halcro, Masek And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Kerttula: Page 1, line 1, following "efforts;" (title amendment): Insert "making appropriations to the Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute for generic salmon marketing;" Page 1, line 4: Delete "6,000,000" Insert "10,000,000" Page 1, following line 9, insert new bill sections to read: "* Sec. 2. The sum of $4,000,000 is appropriated from the general fund to the Department of Community and Economic Development, Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute, for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2003, for generic salmon marketing. 2002-02-04 House Journal Page 2147 * Sec. 3. The sum of $2,000,000 is appropriated from the general fund to the Department of Community and Economic Development, Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute, for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2004, for generic salmon marketing. * Sec. 4. The sum of $2,000,000 is appropriated from the general fund to the Department of Community and Economic Development, Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute, for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2005, for generic salmon marketing. * Sec. 5. The sum of $2,000,000 is appropriated from the general fund to the Department of Community and Economic Development, Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute, for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2006, for generic salmon marketing. * Sec. 6. The sum of $2,000,000 is appropriated from the general fund to the Department of Community and Economic Development, Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute, for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2007, for generic salmon marketing." Page 1, line 10: Delete "* Sec. 2. This Act takes" Insert "* Sec. 7. Sections 1 and 2 of this Act take" Page 1, following line 10, insert new bill sections to read: "* Sec. 8. Section 3 of this Act takes effect July 1, 2003. * Sec. 9. Section 4 of this Act takes effect July 1, 2004. * Sec. 10. Section 5 of this Act takes effect July 1, 2005. * Sec. 11. Section 6 of this Act takes effect July 1, 2006." Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 359 Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 5 ABSENT: 3 2002-02-04 House Journal Page 2148 Yeas: Croft, Davies, Guess, Hayes, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kookesh, Moses, Stevens Nays: Bunde, Coghill, Dyson, Fate, Foster, Harris, Hudson, James, Kohring, Kott, Lancaster, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson Excused: Chenault, Cissna, Green, Halcro, Masek Absent: Berkowitz, Crawford, Joule And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that HB 359 be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HB 359 was read the third time. Representatives Hudson and James moved and asked unanimous consent that they be allowed to abstain from voting due to a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and the members were required to vote. The question being: "Shall HB 359 pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 359 Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 25 NAYS: 10 EXCUSED: 5 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Crawford, Croft, Davies, Fate, Foster, Guess, Harris, Hayes, Hudson, James, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kookesh, Kott, McGuire, Meyer, Mulder, Murkowski, Porter, Rokeberg, Stevens, Whitaker, Williams Nays: Bunde, Coghill, Dyson, Kohring, Lancaster, Morgan, Moses, Ogan, Scalzi, Wilson Excused: Chenault, Cissna, Green, Halcro, Masek And so, HB 359 passed the House. 2002-02-04 House Journal Page 2149 Representative James moved the effective date clause. The question being: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 359 Third Reading Effective Date YEAS: 31 NAYS: 4 EXCUSED: 5 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Crawford, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Fate, Foster, Guess, Harris, Hayes, Hudson, James, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kookesh, Kott, Lancaster, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Porter, Rokeberg, Stevens, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson Nays: Bunde, Coghill, Kohring, Scalzi Excused: Chenault, Cissna, Green, Halcro, Masek And so, the effective date clause was adopted. Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the House adopt the House Finance Committee letter of intent (page 2112). There being no objection, it was so ordered. HB 359 was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.